What Are Token Appreciation Rights (TARs)? A Complete Guide for Crypto Companies

As Web3 companies mature, compensation models have had to evolve beyond traditional salary and equity structures. In the fast-moving world of crypto, where tokens represent ownership, governance, and long-term project value, companies are searching for new ways to align contributor incentives with the success of their ecosystem — all while staying compliant with global tax and securities laws.

For many, the answer lies in Token Appreciation Rights (TARs) — a creative alternative to direct token grants or equity awards that rewards team members for contributing to a project’s growth without transferring actual token ownership.

At their core, TARs are a promise of participation in future value rather than an immediate ownership stake. They’re structured so that recipients — whether employees, contractors, or advisors — benefit financially when the project’s tokens increase in value, without ever holding or trading the underlying tokens themselves.

This approach mirrors traditional Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) used in legacy corporations, where employees receive a cash or share payout based on the appreciation of a company’s stock price. TARs adapt this same mechanism to crypto, using tokens instead of stocks as the reference point for calculating appreciation.

Why does this matter? Because the legal and tax landscape for crypto compensation is complex and fast-changing. In many jurisdictions, granting actual tokens can trigger a range of compliance hurdles: securities registration requirements, tax-withholding obligations, or even restrictions on token transfers. TARs help companies avoid these pitfalls by separating token value exposure from token custody.

For employees, TARs offer the upside of participating in token growth — a potentially lucrative opportunity — without the uncertainty of managing wallets, understanding vesting triggers, or worrying about premature tax events. For employers, they offer an elegant compliance solution, reducing the legal friction of issuing or managing tokens directly.

In practice, TARs function as a bridge between traditional equity-based incentives and the new world of token economies. They are ideal for:

• Early-stage crypto startups that want to reward early contributors but haven’t launched their token yet.
• Established Web3 organizations looking to simplify compliance while maintaining incentive alignment.
• Global teams where direct token grants might not be legally permissible in every jurisdiction.

But despite their flexibility, TARs are not without complexity. They require careful valuation, well-defined vesting schedules, and precise documentation to ensure tax accuracy and regulatory compliance. Poorly structured TARs can expose companies to serious liabilities — from misclassified income to audit risks.

That’s where expertise matters. At Toku, we’ve seen how the smallest details in a token grant agreement — a valuation date, a jurisdictional clause, a vesting term — can have major financial and legal implications down the line. Our goal is to help Web3 organizations implement TARs and other token-based instruments the right way, from day one.

In the sections that follow, we’ll break down how TARs work, when to use them, and what pitfalls to avoid — so your organization can harness their full potential safely and compliantly.

How Token Appreciation Rights (TARs) Work

Token Appreciation Rights (TARs) mirror many principles found in traditional equity-based compensation structures, but they’re uniquely tailored for the crypto economy. Instead of dealing with company shares, TARs are tied to the fair market value (FMV) of tokens, creating a compensation framework that aligns with the decentralized nature of Web3 organizations.

Here’s a breakdown of how TARs typically operate — from issuance to payout and taxation.

1. The Grant Date — Defining the Right to Future Appreciation

The process begins with the company granting TARs to an employee, advisor, or contractor.

At this stage:

• No tokens are transferred. The recipient does not receive actual tokens or ownership rights.
• Instead, they are granted a contractual right to benefit from the appreciation in value of the company’s token.
• The grant agreement defines critical terms such as:
  
  • The number of TARs granted.
  • The base (or exercise) value of the token at grant.
  • Vesting conditions, performance metrics, or employment duration requirements.

The TAR agreement thus functions as a forward-looking incentive — a commitment to share in the upside, contingent on meeting specified conditions.

2. Vesting — Aligning Incentives Over Time

Like other token-based or equity-based compensation models, TARs are often subject to vesting schedules that determine when the rights become exercisable.

Common structures include:

• Time-based vesting: Rights vest gradually over a fixed period (e.g., 25% after one year, then monthly thereafter).
• Milestone-based vesting: Vesting occurs upon reaching defined objectives, such as launching a mainnet, achieving user milestones, or completing a token sale.
• Hybrid vesting: A mix of both — rewarding time commitment while aligning with business milestones.

Vesting ensures that employees and service providers are incentivized to contribute consistently to the long-term success of the project. It also helps companies mitigate the risk of short-term turnover.

3. Establishing the Exercise Price — Setting the Baseline for Growth

At the grant date, the company determines an exercise price (or base value) for its token — typically the fair market value at that moment.
This baseline determines how much appreciation will later be owed when the TAR is exercised.

For compliance, companies often engage independent valuation firms like Teknos or Redwood to conduct third-party token valuations. This step is essential because:

• It provides audit-ready documentation that supports the tax position.
• It minimizes disputes over the token’s value when calculating appreciation.
• It establishes transparency and fairness in employee compensation.

The goal is to create a defensible, standardized valuation process that both employees and regulators can trust.

4. Appreciation — Capturing the Value Growth

Once the TARs are granted and vesting has begun, the token’s value may fluctuate over time.

The “appreciation” represents the difference between:

• The token’s market value at the time of exercise, and
• The token’s base (grant) value.

For example: If a TAR was granted with a base value of $1 per token, and at exercise the token is worth $5, the appreciation is $4 per token.

If the recipient holds 10,000 TARs, their gross appreciation benefit equals $40,000.

This appreciation is what ultimately becomes the employee’s payout entitlement.

5. Payout — Realizing the Benefit

Once the TARs vest and the recipient exercises their rights, the company calculates the payout based on the appreciation amount.

Depending on the agreement, payouts can take multiple forms:

• Cash: The most common option, providing immediate liquidity and avoiding token custody or volatility issues.
• Tokens: Some projects opt to settle appreciation directly in tokens, often converting from treasury holdings.
• Hybrid (cash + token): A balanced approach that meets liquidity needs while reinforcing token alignment.

The payout structure should always be clearly defined in the TAR agreement to avoid ambiguity or regulatory concerns.

6. Taxation — Understanding the Implications

The taxation of TARs varies by jurisdiction but generally follows one core principle: TAR payouts are treated as ordinary income at the time they are exercised or settled.

In most countries (including the U.S.):

• The employer must withhold payroll taxes (income tax, social security, etc.) at the time of payout
• The employee reports the received value as income.
• If the payout is in tokens, the employee’s cost basis for future sales is the FMV of those tokens at settlement.

Failing to withhold or report accurately can trigger severe penalties. In some jurisdictions, misreporting token-based income may even be treated as tax evasion or criminal misconduct.

Given this complexity, TARs require collaboration among tax advisors, payroll administrators, and compliance experts — or, ideally, a crypto-native solution that integrates all three.

7. Why It Matters

By separating token exposure from token ownership, TARs help crypto organizations:

• Simplify regulatory compliance around token transfers and securities classification.
• Maintain control of token treasuries while still rewarding contributors for value creation.
• Offer a globally consistent framework for incentive alignment across jurisdictions.

This balance between flexibility and compliance makes TARs one of the most strategic compensation tools available to crypto-native teams today.

Why and When to Use Token Appreciation Rights (TARs)

Designing a compensation plan for a crypto organization is not just about rewarding effort — it’s about aligning long-term incentives with the health, growth, and sustainability of your token ecosystem. In the world of Web3, where tokens serve as both value stores and participation mechanisms, companies need models that motivate contributors while also respecting the complex web of tax laws, securities regulations, and operational realities across global jurisdictions.

Token Appreciation Rights (TARs) strike this balance perfectly.

They provide an elegant middle ground between direct token ownership and traditional fiat-based compensation — giving contributors upside potential tied to token performance, but without the risks and compliance burdens of direct transfers.

Let’s explore the key reasons and scenarios where TARs make the most sense.

1. Rewarding Growth Without Issuing Tokens

For many organizations, the biggest appeal of TARs lies in preserving treasury control. When you issue actual tokens, you’re parting with an asset — often one that’s both scarce and strategically vital. With TARs, however, you can reward your team based on token appreciation without giving away the tokens themselves.

This approach is particularly valuable for projects that:

• Haven’t yet launched their token or are in a pre-token stage.
• Want to avoid the complexity of on-chain distribution or token custody.
• Need to protect circulating supply to stabilize price and liquidity.

By using TARs, the company retains ownership of the underlying tokens while still allowing employees to benefit financially from growth. It’s incentive alignment without dilution — a rare win-win.

2. Avoiding Securities and Regulatory Risk

Issuing tokens directly to employees or contractors can trigger securities laws or registration requirements in some jurisdictions. Depending on how a token is classified (utility vs. security), the implications can range from simple reporting obligations to complex compliance burdens involving the SEC, FINMA, or the FCA.

TARs mitigate this risk by removing the direct transfer of a regulated asset. Because TARs are contractual rights — not actual token ownership — they don’t necessarily fall under securities classification, provided they’re structured correctly.

In other words, TARs allow organizations to reward contributors compliantly without needing to navigate token transfer restrictions, custodial regulations, or cross-border securities filings.

This makes TARs especially useful for:

• U.S.-based crypto companies concerned about SEC scrutiny.
• Multinational Web3 projects managing contributors in dozens of jurisdictions.
• DAOs and foundations that need compliant ways to compensate core contributors globally.

3. Simplifying Tax and Payroll Operations

Every crypto employer knows that the hardest part of paying in tokens isn’t the transfer — it’s the compliance.

Each token transaction creates a taxable event. If tokens are illiquid, under lockup, or highly volatile, calculating fair market value (FMV) for payroll and withholding becomes a logistical nightmare. This is even more complex when employees are spread across multiple countries, each with different reporting requirements.

TARs simplify this.

Since TARs are cash- or value-settled instruments, they eliminate the need for token transfers, token valuations at every vesting event, and multi-jurisdictional token-based reporting. Companies can execute all payroll obligations in fiat or stablecoins while keeping a clean, compliant record of appreciation-based payouts.

For finance teams, this means less manual calculation, fewer off-cycle payrolls, and lower risk of non-compliance penalties.

4. Ideal for Early-Stage and Pre-Launch Companies

For startups that haven’t yet launched their token or listed it on an exchange, TARs are an invaluable tool.

Early employees and advisors still deserve a stake in the project’s future success — but without a tradable token, traditional grants are impossible. TARs provide a mechanism to mirror token value growth until a token generation event (TGE) occurs.

Later, when the token is live, the TAR agreement can be converted into actual token grants, or the appreciation can be settled in fiat. This gives companies the flexibility to reward pre-launch contributions compliantly while deferring complex regulatory and tax obligations until post-TGE.

5. Enhancing Retention and Motivation

Token Appreciation Rights also help with one of the most persistent challenges in crypto hiring: retaining top talent in a volatile market.

Because TARs are tied to future appreciation, they encourage employees to remain engaged through critical milestones such as product launches, community growth, or governance phases.

When structured with multi-year vesting schedules or milestone triggers, TARs act as powerful retention levers — employees are literally invested in the token’s success.

At the same time, TARs communicate trust and alignment. Employees understand that their financial upside depends on the project’s collective success, not just short-term speculation.

6. Mitigating Legal and Accounting Complexity

Crypto companies operating globally face an intricate matrix of rules:

• Payroll tax thresholds
• Labor regulations
• Securities classifications
• Local currency remittance requirements

Managing all of these with direct token compensation can quickly overwhelm in-house teams. TARs streamline this by converting complex token-based compensation into a predictable financial instrument that fits within standard accounting and payroll systems.

Companies can issue TARs with clear documentation and valuation protocols, enabling auditors and tax advisors to track them easily.

This clarity reduces the risk of disputes, misstatements, or compliance audits — a key advantage for projects seeking institutional funding or enterprise partnerships.

When TARs Make the Most Sense

TARs are most valuable when:
✅ You want to align contributor incentives with token growth without issuing tokens.
✅ You’re operating across multiple jurisdictions with evolving crypto regulations.
✅ You’re in a pre-token or early launch phase and can’t yet distribute tokens.
✅ You need a compliant alternative to equity-like token grants.
✅ You’re optimizing retention through milestone- or performance-based vesting.

When structured properly, TARs create a modern, compliant compensation model that blends financial motivation, regulatory safety, and operational simplicity.

Downsides and Tax Implications of TARs

While Token Appreciation Rights (TARs) offer a flexible and compliant way to reward contributors, they also come with their share of complexities and potential pitfalls.

Understanding these challenges is essential for founders, HR teams, and legal counsel before implementing TARs at scale — because mistakes in structure, valuation, or taxation can lead to severe financial and regulatory consequences.

Below are the key downsides of TARs — and how companies can proactively manage them.

1. No Direct Ownership or Voting Rights

Perhaps the most obvious drawback is that TARs don’t grant actual token ownership. The recipient holds only a right to the appreciation — not the underlying asset.

That means employees and contractors:

• Don’t receive voting rights in DAO governance.
• Don’t have transfer or staking privileges tied to the tokens.
• Can’t directly participate in token utility or yield opportunities until payout.

For teams deeply embedded in a decentralized ecosystem, this lack of on-chain participation may feel limiting. Some contributors view TARs as “synthetic exposure” rather than true alignment.

✅ Mitigation; Projects often pair TARs with other incentive programs — such as bonus pools, community airdrops, or governance token allocations — to maintain cultural and financial alignment while staying compliant.

2. Ordinary Income Treatment — No Capital Gains Advantage

A major tax downside of TARs is that the appreciation is treated as ordinary income, not as capital gains. This means higher tax rates apply when the TARs are settled — often ranging between 30% and 50% depending on the jurisdiction.

Let’s illustrate: If an employee’s TARs appreciate by $100,000 and are paid out in fiat or tokens, the entire $100,000 is taxed as income at the time of settlement.

Had those tokens been owned directly and held long-term, part of that gain could have qualified for capital gains tax treatment instead.

✅ Mitigation:

• Educate employees on this distinction early to manage expectations.
• Consider blending TARs with direct token grants (subject to vesting) for senior contributors who can accept additional risk.
• Work with crypto-savvy tax advisors to explore local deferral or withholding optimization strategies.

3. Complex Valuation Requirements

TARs depend on establishing a fair market value (FMV) of the company’s token at multiple stages: grant, vesting, and exercise. If valuation data is inconsistent, unverified, or based on volatile markets, disputes can arise between the company, auditors, and tax authorities.

Because most tokens are thinly traded, even minor price fluctuations can significantly impact the calculated appreciation value — and therefore, the reported taxable income.

✅ Mitigation:

• Partner with independent valuation firms (like Teknos or Redwood) to document and justify FMV determinations.
• Use consistent valuation dates and methodologies (e.g., daily average closing price across multiple exchanges).
• Maintain meticulous audit trails and timestamped records for all TAR events.

4. Payroll and Withholding Obligations

Even though TARs are token-linked, the resulting payout is a wage event for tax and compliance purposes.

Employers must correctly withhold and remit taxes (income, payroll, social security, etc.) in local currency. If the company settles TARs in tokens or stablecoins, it must still calculate and remit fiat-denominated withholding to the relevant tax authorities.

Failing to do so can result in:

• Payroll compliance violations.
• IRS or local tax audits.
• Late payment penalties and interest charges.

✅ Mitigation:

• Integrate TARs within a crypto-compliant payroll system (like Toku’s).
• Automate fiat conversions for withholding.
• Ensure HR and finance teams coordinate with tax counsel before settlement dates.

5. Accounting and Reporting Complexity

From an accounting perspective, TARs are classified as liability-based compensation instruments under IFRS 2 or ASC 718. That means their fair value must be re-measured at every reporting date until they are settled — unlike equity awards, which are valued once at grant.

This can complicate financial reporting, especially for projects with highly volatile tokens. Changes in token price between reporting periods can cause significant P&L volatility, impacting financial statements and investor perceptions.

✅ Mitigation:

• Record TAR liabilities consistently in your accounting system with proper valuation methodology.
• Consider using stablecoins or capped-value TARs to reduce volatility.
• Coordinate early with auditors to agree on measurement and disclosure policies.

6. Legal and Jurisdictional Risks

TARs are still a relatively new construct in most legal systems. Because they bridge crypto and traditional finance, there’s limited precedent for how regulators or courts might classify or interpret them.

Certain jurisdictions may view TARs as:

• A derivative contract, triggering additional regulatory requirements.
• A form of deferred compensation subject to specific timing and reporting rules.
• Or even a security, depending on how the rights are structured and distributed.

✅ Mitigation:

• Always seek jurisdiction-specific legal review before implementing TARs.
• Standardize agreements using tested templates reviewed by crypto-focused law firms.
• Where uncertainty exists, operate under conservative assumptions — especially for U.S. participants.

7. Limited Liquidity and Timing Risks

TARs only have value if the token appreciates. If market conditions decline or the token fails to gain traction, TARs can end up worthless. Recipients might perceive them as speculative or illiquid, especially in bear markets.

✅ Mitigation:

• Clearly communicate the risk–reward profile of TARs during onboarding.
• Combine TARs with stablecoin or fiat-based components to provide a baseline of guaranteed compensation.
• Offer transparent updates on token valuation and project milestones to build trust and engagement.

Bottom Line

TARs are powerful tools — but they require precision. Their hybrid nature means they sit at the intersection of employment law, securities regulation, tax compliance, and accounting standards.

Handled correctly, TARs create compliant, scalable ways to reward contributors in a tokenized economy. 

Handled poorly, they can expose your organization to tax liabilities, legal scrutiny, or dissatisfied employees.

That’s why partnering with experts like Toku — who specialize in crypto-native payroll, token grant administration, and tax compliance — ensures your TAR program operates smoothly, transparently, and globally compliantly.

Reward Growth, Stay Compliant, and Simplify with Toku

Token Appreciation Rights (TARs) have emerged as one of the most adaptable compensation structures in the crypto industry — giving organizations the ability to reward contributors for long-term token growth without transferring actual tokens or triggering unnecessary compliance risks.

They enable companies to align employee incentives with project success while maintaining control of token supply, simplifying tax operations, and avoiding direct exposure to complex securities or payroll regulations.

But while TARs unlock flexibility, they also demand expert structuring and careful execution.

If handled incorrectly, TARs can quickly become a compliance trap — from misclassified income and inaccurate valuations to tax withholding errors that expose your organization to severe penalties.

That’s why the most forward-looking crypto companies turn to Toku.

Toku combines:

• Crypto-native expertise in token grants, equity, and appreciation rights.
• Automated, audit-ready compliance tools that simplify valuation, withholding, and reporting.
• Human oversight by legal and tax specialists who ensure every TAR is issued, vested, and settled accurately across 150+ jurisdictions.

With Toku, your team can focus on building — while we handle the complexity of crypto-native compensation. Whether you’re issuing your first TARs or scaling global token-based incentives, we’ll ensure your organization stays compliant, efficient, and ready for growth.

Simplify token appreciation rights, tax compliance, and payroll — all in one platform.

 👉 Make it simple today with Toku.

‍