Pre-TGE Readiness Guide: Token Launch Compliance for GCs & CFOs

Launching a token is far more than a technical milestone — it’s an organizational transformation that redefines how your company operates, manages risk, and interacts with global regulators.

In the 12–24 weeks before your Token Generation Event (TGE), every function in your organization — legal, finance, operations, and HR — will need to evolve. What was once a single-entity Delaware C-Corp becomes a multi-entity ecosystem spanning offshore jurisdictions, distributed teams, and complex intercompany relationships.

It’s a pivotal moment where small oversights can lead to massive downstream consequences. Weak intercompany documentation, unclear IP ownership, non-compliant employment structures, or inadequate insurance coverage can all delay — or even derail — a TGE.

For General Counsels (GCs), Chief Operating Officers (COOs), and Chief Financial Officers (CFOs), this stage is about building resilience — not just speed. You’re tasked with:

• Establishing a defensible legal structure that satisfies regulators.
• Transitioning your workforce across entities without triggering tax or immigration liabilities.
• Designing token-based compensation that aligns with securities and tax law.
• Setting up governance frameworks that clearly separate corporate decisions from protocol control.
• Securing specialized insurance coverage that recognizes the realities of digital assets.

These are not hypothetical risks. Standard insurance programs often exclude token-related exposures. Conventional payroll providers can’t process token grants or withhold taxes correctly. And most corporate lawyers are unfamiliar with the nuances of crypto governance and intercompany risk.

That’s why forward-thinking executives prepare early — assembling the right mix of specialized legal counsel, insurance partners, and employment experts like Toku to build a compliant, scalable foundation for token issuance.

This guide breaks down the strategic areas every executive team must address to ensure their token launch is structured, compliant, and future-proof. Whether you’re twelve weeks from TGE or just beginning to design your token economy, use this framework to:

• Anticipate cross-jurisdictional risks.
• Avoid structural and compliance pitfalls.
• Protect both your protocol and your people.

Launching a token isn’t just about creating value — it’s about preserving it. The organizations that plan meticulously before TGE are the ones that thrive after it.

Corporate Structure: Meeting Token Issuance Legal Requirements

A successful token launch begins long before a single token is issued. It starts with the corporate structure — the foundation on which your entire ecosystem rests.

Transitioning from a traditional startup into a token-issuing organization is not a simple reorganization. It’s a strategic transformation that introduces new entities, jurisdictions, and governance models — each with its own compliance and tax implications.

Most blockchain projects begin as a single U.S. entity, often a Delaware C-Corp. But as token issuance becomes part of the roadmap, that structure must evolve. The result is typically a multi-entity framework designed to separate core business operations from token-related activities, clarify intercompany relationships, and protect both the project and its contributors from regulatory uncertainty.

The Multi-Entity Framework Explained

In a compliant token launch structure, the U.S. entity usually retains its traditional functions:

• Product and protocol development
• Marketing and business operations
• Partnerships and vendor management

Meanwhile, an offshore entity — most commonly established in the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands, or Singapore — becomes the token issuer. This entity handles treasury management, holds intellectual property (IP), and governs token-related activities under a framework designed to reduce U.S. securities exposure.

Some organizations may also set up additional entities:

• Regional operating subsidiaries for global employment or tax optimization.
• Research foundations dedicated to long-term protocol development.
• Treasury management entities responsible for secure token custody and capital allocation.

Each entity serves a specific role in the broader structure — and the integrity of that system depends on precise intercompany documentation.

Intercompany Agreements and IP Frameworks

One of the most critical — and frequently mishandled — aspects of a multi-entity token structure is intercompany documentation.

These agreements define how entities interact and must be drafted at arm’s length to withstand scrutiny from both tax authorities and regulators. Common documentation includes:

• Service Agreements: Clearly define deliverables, compensation terms, and scope of work between entities.
• IP Licensing Agreements: Establish who owns protocol IP, how it’s licensed, and what compensation structure applies.
• Treasury Management Protocols: Detail how funds move between entities and under what conditions.

Poorly defined agreements invite tax penalties, regulatory risk, and disputes over control of the project. Transfer pricing audits alone can lead to penalties of up to 20% of the transaction value, plus interest — a devastating outcome for any early-stage token issuer.

Jurisdictional Selection and Tax Considerations

Choosing the right jurisdiction for your offshore entity isn’t about copying what others have done — it’s about aligning with your token model and long-term governance plan.

A strong jurisdictional strategy should consider:

• Regulatory clarity around digital assets and securities law.
• Tax treaties and local compliance requirements.
• Banking accessibility for both fiat and stablecoin operations.
• Reputation and investor confidence — some jurisdictions are viewed more favorably by institutional participants.

Your tax and banking strategy should be developed in parallel. Establish compliant fund flow mechanisms between entities to prevent inadvertent tax triggers or AML/KYC breaches. This preparation often takes 8–12 weeks, so it’s vital to begin early.

Common Corporate Structure Pitfalls

Despite best intentions, many projects stumble over the same issues during pre-TGE structuring.

1. Weak Intercompany Agreements: Vague contracts without clear deliverables or market-rate pricing expose companies to transfer pricing challenges and penalties.
2. Banking Access Delays: Offshore entities often struggle to open compliant bank accounts in time. Without preparation, teams may be forced into risky workarounds that can violate compliance requirements.
3. Unclear IP Ownership: Failing to document IP transfers or licenses creates disputes over who controls the protocol — a risk that has led to multiple lawsuits and even project shutdowns.
4. Incomplete Entity Separation: Overlapping personnel and operational roles between entities blur compliance lines, raising red flags for regulators and investors alike.
   
   

The Role of Specialized Legal Counsel

Generic startup counsel rarely has the experience necessary to navigate token issuance. Specialized blockchain legal advisors provide critical guidance in:

• Structuring intercompany relationships that meet regulatory expectations.
• Drafting token-issuer documentation with defensible legal reasoning.
• Coordinating between U.S. and offshore entities to avoid tax and securities conflicts.

These experts understand how precedent-setting cases, SEC guidance, and jurisdiction-specific rulings affect token issuance — enabling you to build a structure that stands up to investor due diligence and future audits.

The right counsel doesn’t just help you launch — they help you sustain credibility long after your token hits the market.

Employment & Compensation: Managing a Distributed Team

Launching a token introduces a powerful new dynamic to your organization — but it also complicates how you employ, compensate, and retain your people. Once your structure expands across multiple jurisdictions, your employment and payroll obligations become exponentially more complex.

You can no longer rely on a single payroll provider or a generic contractor agreement. Instead, you’ll need a carefully designed global employment framework that ensures every contributor — whether in San Francisco, Singapore, or Lisbon — is paid legally, taxed correctly, and aligned with your token strategy.

At the same time, token-based incentives must be structured with precision. A single misstep in classification or taxation can trigger penalties, disqualify contributors from long-term incentive programs, or cause regulatory breaches that ripple across the organization.

The Core Challenge: Multi-Entity Employment

A multi-entity structure changes everything about how you manage your workforce.

When new offshore or foundation entities are created, existing employees must often transition to different employers. This shift creates a cascade of operational challenges:

• How do you reassign employees across entities without triggering termination risk or visa issues?
• How do you manage token-based incentives across entities without creating taxable events or securities law exposure?
• How do you keep teams motivated and informed through complex structural transitions?

Each jurisdiction has its own employment laws, worker classification standards, and tax rules. Attempting to navigate these alone — or through ad hoc local advisors — can quickly become a compliance nightmare.

Token Compensation as a Global Incentive Tool

Token grants are one of the most powerful retention mechanisms in Web3. But they’re also one of the riskiest if handled incorrectly.

Unlike traditional equity, tokens are not automatically treated as “Service Recipient Stock” under U.S. tax law. This means Section 409A, 83(b) elections, and other deferred compensation rules often apply — creating significant tax and timing risks for both the company and recipients.

To mitigate these risks, token compensation plans should:

• Define clear vesting schedules and grant documentation that specify rights, restrictions, and tax treatment.
• Ensure compliance with securities regulations in every country where employees or contributors reside.
• Implement lock-up and trading policies to prevent early sales that could trigger insider trading concerns.
• Maintain complete records for due diligence, audits, and future token valuation events.

Without this structure, companies risk employees facing unexpected tax bills or losing access to their tokens due to compliance missteps.

How Toku Simplifies Global Employment and Token Compensation

Toku was built to solve exactly these challenges.

Our global employment infrastructure allows blockchain companies to hire and pay compliantly in over 100 jurisdictions — without setting up local entities.

Here’s how Toku helps organizations during the pre-TGE transition:

• Employer of Record (EOR) and Professional Employer Organization (PEO) services: Legally employ team members in countries where you don’t yet have a legal entity, while remaining fully compliant with local laws.
• Token Grant Administration: Manage token vesting, grant documentation, and tax compliance through a single dashboard. Toku ensures each grant follows jurisdiction-specific regulations and is correctly tracked for tax reporting.
• Stablecoin Payroll Options: Pay employees or contractors partially in stablecoins (USDC, USDT, or USDG) while maintaining proper withholding, reporting, and compliance.
• Insider Trading Compliance: Toku integrates pre-clearance and blackout period controls to prevent token-related trades that could expose your team to regulatory scrutiny.
  
  

By integrating employment, payroll, and token administration, Toku helps teams maintain compliance, transparency, and morale during structural transformation.

Key Steps for Building an Employment Framework

To prepare your workforce for token issuance, focus on these key areas:

1. Staff Allocation: Develop a staffing plan identifying which entity each role belongs to and ensure proper documentation for any transfers.
2. Employment Compliance: Establish compliant employment contracts, benefits, and payroll systems in every jurisdiction where contributors are based.
3. Token Grant Documentation: Create token-specific agreements (not equity templates) that address unique aspects like forks, airdrops, and staking rewards.
4. Communication Strategy: Communicate openly with your team about structural changes, vesting mechanics, and what token grants mean for their total compensation.
5. Payroll Infrastructure: Implement systems that support hybrid fiat and stablecoin payments to meet global contributor preferences.
   
   

Common Employment & Compensation Pitfalls

Many blockchain organizations underestimate how quickly employment compliance issues can compound. The most frequent and costly mistakes include:

• Worker Misclassification: Treating full-time contributors as contractors to save time or taxes can result in penalties of 30–100% of total wages and backdated benefits obligations.
• Equity Templates for Token Grants: Using legacy stock option templates for token grants ignores the nuances of crypto assets — leading to disputes, audits, and regulatory noncompliance.
• No Insider Trading Controls: Without structured trading policies, early employees may accidentally violate securities laws during lock-up or pre-listing periods.
• Tax Withholding Failures: Some EORs or payroll providers refuse to handle token-based withholding — a gap that exposes both the company and employees to unpaid tax liabilities.
• Smart Contract Vesting Without Tax Synchronization: Automating vesting on-chain without reporting the tax impact in real-time can trigger underreporting penalties and noncompliance with local tax authorities.
  
  

The Bottom Line

Managing a distributed workforce during a token launch requires cross-functional coordination — combining HR, finance, legal, and technical expertise. The goal is not just to stay compliant, but to create a structure where global contributors feel secure, motivated, and aligned with the company’s token strategy.

Toku’s global employment and token compensation solutions simplify that process. From onboarding and payroll to vesting and tax compliance, Toku gives teams the confidence to scale across borders without losing focus on what truly matters — building, shipping, and innovating safely.

Governance & Operational Readiness

When an organization moves toward token issuance, its governance structure must evolve from a startup-style management approach to a multi-layered governance system that can support both corporate operations and decentralized protocol oversight.

This evolution isn’t optional — it’s foundational. Token issuance introduces new stakeholders, new decision-making layers, and new forms of accountability. Strong governance ensures operational control, regulatory compliance, and community trust, all while protecting against the conflicts of interest that can arise when teams hold tokens.

The New Scope of Governance After a Token Launch

Once tokens enter the picture, your governance framework must address two parallel realities:

1. Corporate Governance: How your company makes strategic, financial, and operational decisions.
2. Protocol Governance: How your blockchain protocol evolves, allocates treasury funds, and interacts with the community.

These systems must remain distinct but aligned. Without clear separation, teams risk blurring internal decision-making with on-chain governance — a common source of regulatory risk and community backlash.

A token issuer’s governance must therefore balance three key principles:

• Transparency: All decisions affecting token holders or the protocol must be recorded, reviewable, and auditable.
• Control: Treasury and token distributions require multi-party authorization and segregation of duties.
• Accountability: Conflicts of interest must be managed through structured disclosure and approval processes.

Building Governance Systems That Scale

In the pre-TGE phase, your governance framework should mature alongside your entity structure. Focus on defining who decides what, how those decisions are executed, and how records are maintained.

Here are the essential components of an operationally ready governance model:

1. Treasury Management Policies

Treasury management is the heartbeat of any token-issuing organization. It controls both on-chain and off-chain assets — and improper controls here can expose millions in risk.

Implement:

• Multi-signature requirements for all treasury transactions, ensuring no single individual has unilateral control.
• Role-based permissions separating token distribution, corporate finance, and protocol treasury management.
• Custody and access protocols defining how private keys are stored, rotated, and revoked when personnel change.
• Audit trails and sign-off workflows documenting every transaction and approval for regulatory and internal review.

2. Token Distribution Controls

Every token movement — from founder allocations to community grants — should follow a verified, auditable process.

Establish:

• Pre-approved distribution schedules with transparent logic tied to vesting or liquidity events.
• Dual verification procedures where two independent parties must approve each transfer.
• Regular reconciliation reviews between treasury balances, smart contracts, and corporate ledgers.
• Post-distribution reporting summarizing every transfer for board and stakeholder oversight.

3. Decision-Making Authority

Define the scope of authority for each entity and role within your organization. This includes:

• Which decisions belong to the U.S. corporate board versus the offshore foundation council.
• What actions require joint approval from both entities (for example, treasury reallocations or protocol upgrades).
• How decisions are communicated and documented between entities to maintain transparency.

Clear documentation avoids costly ambiguity later — especially if regulators question whether decisions were made by the appropriate governing body.

4. Conflict of Interest Policies

In token ecosystems, conflicts of interest can appear in subtle ways. Developers, executives, or community members holding tokens may benefit financially from decisions they influence.

Create a conflict policy that:

• Requires full disclosure of any token holdings or related-party interests.
• Implements recusal procedures for decision-makers where conflicts exist.
• Establishes annual conflict certifications to maintain compliance and accountability.

These procedures don’t just protect your project legally — they demonstrate integrity to your investors and community.

Common Governance & Operational Pitfalls

Even well-intentioned teams can fall into traps that undermine governance maturity. The most frequent failures include:

1. Weak Key Management: Projects relying on simple multisig setups without redundancy often lose access when signers leave. Entire treasuries — sometimes worth tens of millions — have become inaccessible due to missing recovery processes or misplaced keys.
2. Lack of Decision Documentation: Failure to document the rationale behind key decisions can expose executives to securities fraud allegations, particularly if those decisions materially affect token value.
3. Blurring Protocol and Corporate Governance: When corporate executives hold substantial tokens and also vote in protocol governance, it can lead to community distrust or even hard forks. Separating roles and disclosures helps preserve legitimacy.
4. Over-centralized Operations: A handful of insiders controlling governance wallets or treasury approvals creates reputational and compliance risks — especially under scrutiny from regulators or exchanges.
   
   

Toku’s Role in Operational Readiness

Toku’s platform helps blockchain organizations operationalize governance with compliance at its core.

Our infrastructure supports:

• Segregated payroll and token management systems, ensuring that employment compensation, treasury disbursements, and token distributions remain distinct and auditable.
• Compliant documentation templates for trading policies, insider disclosures, and token governance frameworks.
• Integration with multisig and custody partners, aligning operational workflows with best-practice treasury controls.
• Centralized dashboards for tracking employee, protocol, and foundation activity — all with audit-ready transparency.

By embedding governance and operational discipline early, Toku helps token-issuing companies avoid the pitfalls that have derailed otherwise successful projects.

The Takeaway

Strong governance is not an administrative burden — it’s a competitive advantage. It signals to investors, regulators, and contributors that your project is built for long-term stability, not short-term hype.

In the lead-up to your token launch, clear governance can mean the difference between a seamless TGE and a public relations crisis.

Establish controls, document decisions, and separate corporate and protocol functions before tokens ever hit the market — because once they do, every action is under the spotlight.

Risk Management & Insurance for Token Projects: Securing Real Protection

Risk management during the pre-TGE phase isn’t just about mitigating losses — it’s about protecting the organization’s ability to operate. Once a company begins the transition toward becoming a token issuer, its risk profile changes dramatically.

Traditional corporate insurance programs simply weren’t designed for blockchain-based business models. Most contain sweeping exclusions for digital assets, token issuance, and decentralized finance activities. That means many Web3 teams heading toward their TGE are effectively uninsured against the most serious threats they face.

If a smart contract vulnerability, wallet breach, or regulatory action occurs — standard D&O or cyber policies likely won’t apply. The result can be catastrophic: litigation costs, personal liability for executives, and losses from token theft or protocol exploits can cripple even the best-funded projects.

To operate confidently, token-issuing organizations must design a crypto-specific insurance program that aligns with their corporate structure, treasury practices, and technical exposure.

Why Token Issuance Redefines Risk

When a company issues a token, it effectively becomes both a technology provider and a quasi-financial institution. That dual role creates unique exposures that traditional insurers struggle to classify.

Your organization now faces:

• Securities and regulatory risk if tokens are deemed unregistered securities or issued without adequate disclosure.
• Operational risk from protocol bugs, key mismanagement, or on-chain exploits.
• Treasury and custody risk involving the safekeeping of high-value digital assets across multiple wallets.
• Governance and management liability for decisions made by directors, officers, or multisig signers that affect token value.

Each of these exposures demands tailored coverage — and coordinated design across your legal and entity framework.

Key Coverage Types Every Token-Issuing Company Needs

1. Directors & Officers (D&O) Liability Coverage

D&O insurance protects company leaders from personal liability arising from management decisions.

For token projects, standard D&O coverage almost always includes digital asset exclusions, meaning executives are exposed when actions involve token issuance, treasury management, or DAO governance.

Your D&O policy should:

• Be specifically drafted for token-related operations across both U.S. and offshore entities.
• Include coverage for regulatory investigations linked to token issuance or exchange listings.
• Recognize the interrelationship between your foundation, operating company, and DAO governance structures.

Without these provisions, executives could face millions in personal liability for decisions made during or after TGE.

2. Professional Liability (E&O) Coverage

Professional liability insurance protects the organization against claims of errors, negligence, or misrepresentation in professional services.

For blockchain teams, this includes smart contract development, audits, consulting, or infrastructure services tied to the protocol.

Projects providing staking, validator, or custody services should ensure their policies explicitly cover blockchain infrastructure and token economic design.

3. Crime & Digital Asset Coverage

This protects the organization against theft or loss of tokens, whether from internal fraud, external hacks, or operational errors.

To qualify for claims, most policies require strict security controls, including:

• Multi-signature and multi-factor authentication.
• Cold-storage custody for treasury funds.
• Defined access management and key-rotation procedures.

Projects without these controls risk denial of claims even after paying significant premiums.

Proper setup — ideally audited by your insurer or partner like Toku or Vouch — is essential to ensure protection actually applies.

4. Cyber Liability Coverage

Token-issuing organizations face cyber threats far beyond those of a normal SaaS company.

Coverage should include:

• Smart contract breaches and code exploits.
• Denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks during token events.
• Phishing or social engineering attacks on team wallets.
• Incident response and forensics support to minimize downtime.

5. Employment Practices & Global Payroll Coverage

Once you employ contributors across multiple jurisdictions, you also assume employment-related liabilities — discrimination, wrongful termination, and wage claims.

These should be covered under a global employment policy that accounts for token-based compensation, especially where payroll involves stablecoins or mixed payments.

Common Risk & Insurance Pitfalls

Even well-intentioned teams often discover coverage gaps only after an incident occurs. The most frequent and costly mistakes include:

1. Hidden Cryptocurrency Exclusions: Many founders assume that “technology company” coverage extends to token activities. It doesn’t. Digital asset exclusions are often buried deep in the definitions section — invalidating claims tied to token issuance, wallets, or exchanges.
2. Coverage Gaps Across Entities: U.S. entities get insured, but offshore foundations — the actual token issuers — are left exposed. When claims target those entities, executives realize too late that no coverage applies.
3. Hot Wallet Vulnerabilities: Insurers may deny claims if security controls fall short of policy standards. Without strict procedures for key custody and transaction authorization, thefts can result in zero recovery.
4. Inadequate Policy Limits: A $5M D&O limit may seem sufficient, but regulatory defense costs in a major enforcement action can exceed that quickly. Limits should align with projected token valuation, liquidity, and jurisdictional risk.

How Vouch Protects Token-Issuing Organizations

Toku collaborates closely with Vouch, a leading insurance provider specializing in Web3 coverage.

Vouch works with carriers experienced in crypto risk, providing tailored policies that close the gaps left by traditional insurers.

Their crypto-specific programs include:

• D&O policies designed for token issuers and multi-entity corporate structures.
• Crime and cyber coverage for digital asset custody and on-chain transactions.
• Regulatory defense support, covering legal costs from investigations or enforcement actions.
• Custom endorsements removing broad crypto exclusions from standard policies.

By integrating insurance planning into the pre-TGE process, companies can prevent coverage denials, protect directors, and reassure investors that operational risk is properly managed.

Checklist: Building a Token-Ready Insurance Program

To ensure readiness before your TGE:

1. Secure D&O coverage designed for token issuers across all entities.
2. Add professional liability tailored to smart contract and protocol development.
3. Implement crime and digital asset coverage for treasury operations.
4. Enhance cyber protection for token-related infrastructure.
5. Review every policy for hidden cryptocurrency exclusions.
6. Align policy limits with projected token valuation and jurisdictional exposure.

The Takeaway

Token issuance introduces new risk categories that traditional insurance doesn’t recognize.

By proactively redesigning your risk management and insurance program, you’re not just protecting assets — you’re safeguarding your leadership, investors, and community trust.

Partnering with specialized providers like Vouch and Toku ensures your coverage reflects the realities of token-based operations: multi-entity structures, digital assets, and global contributors.

A well-structured insurance program transforms your risk profile from vulnerable to resilient — giving your executives confidence that your token launch is built on a foundation of protection and compliance.

FAQ: Pre-TGE Readiness and Token Launch Compliance

1. What does “Pre-TGE” actually mean?

Pre-TGE (Pre–Token Generation Event) refers to the critical 12–24 weeks leading up to the public release or distribution of a project’s token. During this time, legal, structural, and operational foundations must be finalized — including entity formation, token economics, employment frameworks, governance controls, and insurance readiness. It’s the period when your organization transitions from a private, single-entity company into a compliant, multi-entity token issuer.

2. Why can’t a standard startup structure work for token issuance?

A single-entity Delaware C-Corp is insufficient for token issuance because tokens often have different legal, tax, and operational implications than traditional equity.

Most token projects need a multi-entity structure — typically a U.S. operating company and an offshore foundation (Cayman, BVI, etc.) that issues the token and manages treasury and governance. This separation limits liability, satisfies regulatory expectations, and ensures proper fund flow between entities.

3. How far in advance should we start preparing for TGE?

Ideally, at least 6 months before your planned token generation event.

Forming entities, securing banking access, implementing governance frameworks, and obtaining crypto-compatible insurance can take longer than expected. Starting early prevents compliance shortcuts — and avoids launch delays caused by banking, employment, or regulatory bottlenecks.

4. What are the biggest compliance mistakes teams make before launching a token?

Common pitfalls include:

• Relying on standard equity grant templates for token compensation.
• Failing to establish insider trading and disclosure policies.
• Overlooking banking and treasury readiness for offshore entities.
• Ignoring crypto exclusions in insurance coverage.
• Misclassifying employees or contractors across jurisdictions. Each of these issues can create lasting regulatory and reputational damage if not addressed pre-TGE.

5. How does Toku help with token launch readiness?

Toku provides the employment, payroll, and token compensation infrastructure that token-issuing companies need to operate compliantly.

We help teams:

• Employ global contributors legally through EOR/PEO services.
• Administer token grants with full tax and vesting compliance.
• Implement insider trading policies and pre-clearance workflows.
• Pay teams in fiat or stablecoins — with proper withholding and reporting. 

By partnering with Toku early, GCs, COOs, and CFOs can build the operational backbone their token project needs before launch day.

6. What about risk management — where does Vouch fit in?

Vouch provides specialized insurance coverage for token-issuing organizations, closing the gaps left by traditional carriers.

Working together, Toku and Vouch offer a complete compliance and protection framework:

• Toku handles employment, token compensation, and operational controls.
• Vouch secures D&O, cyber, and digital asset coverage tailored to your structure.

Together, they allow leadership teams to move confidently through TGE preparation and beyond.

Be Compliant Be Pre-TGE Readiness Guide

The pre-TGE phase is more than a legal checklist — it’s the foundation for your project’s long-term credibility and survival.

How your organization handles corporate structuring, employment transitions, governance, and risk management in these months determines not only your launch success, but your ability to scale compliantly afterward.

Projects that prepare early, seek specialized counsel, and integrate trusted partners stand apart. They launch smoothly, attract institutional investors, and avoid the chaos of last-minute regulatory crises.

By partnering with Toku for employment and token compliance, and Vouch for insurance and risk protection, you’re equipping your organization with the tools, structure, and safeguards to thrive in a regulated, high-stakes environment.

Token issuance isn’t just a milestone — it’s a transformation.

Approach it strategically, prepare diligently, and build with compliance at your core. That’s how sustainable, trustworthy blockchain companies are built.

‍